Peer Review Process
The practice of peer review is intended to ensure that only good science is published. As an objective method of guaranteeing excellence in scholarly publishing, it has been adopted by all reputable scientific conferences. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Conference of SEMEABB, which is why all incoming manuscripts are peer-reviewed.
Initial manuscript evaluation
One of the Chief Editors first evaluates all submitted manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the conference. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least two expert referees for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will usually be informed within two weeks of receipt.
Archive Access Policy
The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.